IV. Comparison of simultaneous magnetic disturbances at several observatories

Author:

Abstract

In my former on Magnetic Disturbances and Earth Currents, which were read at the ngs of the British Association at Swansea in 1880 and at York in 1881, a iparison was made of the declination and the horizontal force traces given by the self-recording instruments at five European stations, also at one station in India, one in China, and one in Australia. An attempt was made to determine the relative amounts of the simultaneous changes at the several observatories by comparing them with one another by means of the scale values of the instruments employed, which were all of the pattern of the self-recording instruments at the Kew Observatory. It was found on comparison that there were great differences in the scale values of the instruments of the same kind at the different observatories, and in some ca here was great uncertainty as to the scale values, because no determination of had recently been made. Hence great difficulty was found in arriving at the meaning of the records which were taken regularly at the different observatories. The comparison was sufficient to show the great importance of adopting the same scale values for the like instruments at all observatories. In my paper a recomendation was made that for horizontal force records a scale value of ·0005 millimetremilligramme for a difference of scale reading of 1 mm. should be adopted as being the most convenient. The same scale value was recommended by Dr. Wild, of the St. Petersburg Observatory, and for the vertical force magnetometer the same scale value might conveniently be adopted. With this scale value the instruments would be sufficiently sensitive to give for a considerable magnetic disturbance changes which are capable of being measured, but yet would not be so sensitive as to send the spot of light off the photographic paper, even in a violent magnetic storm.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3