Source-sink behavioural dynamics limit institutional evolution in a group-structured society

Author:

Hébert-Dufresne Laurent123ORCID,Waring Timothy M.45ORCID,St-Onge Guillaume67ORCID,Niles Meredith T.3,Kati Corlew Laura8,Dube Matthew P.9,Miller Stephanie J.55,Gotelli Nicholas J.10,McGill Brian J.55

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, University of Vermont, Burlington VT, USA

2. Vermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington VT, USA

3. Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington VT, USA

4. School of Economics, University of Maine, Orono ME, USA

5. Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions, University of Maine, Orono ME, USA

6. Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique, Université Laval, Québec (Québec), Canada G1V 0A6

7. Centre interdisciplinaire en modélisation mathématique, Université Laval, Québec (Québec), Canada G1V 0A6

8. Department of Social Science, University of Maine at Augusta, Bangor ME, USA

9. Department of Computer Information Systems, University of Maine at Augusta, Bangor ME, USA

10. Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington VT, USA

Abstract

Social change in any society entails changes in both behaviours and institutions. We model a group-structured society in which the transmission of individual behaviour occurs in parallel with the selection of group-level institutions. We consider a cooperative behaviour that generates collective benefits for groups but does not spread between individuals on its own. Groups exhibit institutions that increase the diffusion of the behaviour within the group, but also incur a group cost. Groups adopt institutions in proportion to their fitness. Finally, the behaviour may also spread globally. We find that behaviour and institutions can be mutually reinforcing. But the model also generates behavioural source-sink dynamics when behaviour generated in institutionalized groups spreads to non-institutionalized groups and boosts their fitness. Consequently, the global diffusion of group-beneficial behaviour creates a pattern of institutional free-riding that limits the evolution of group-beneficial institutions. Our model suggests that, in a group-structured society, large-scale beneficial social change can be best achieved when the relevant behaviour and institutions remain correlated.

Funder

Google Open Source

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

National Science Foundation

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Enhancing the health and wellbeing benefits of biodiversity citizen science;Frontiers in Environmental Science;2024-08-21

2. Paradoxes in the coevolution of contagions and institutions;Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2024-08

3. Integrating evolutionary theory and social–ecological systems research to address the sustainability challenges of the Anthropocene;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2023-11-13

4. Minority-group incubators and majority-group reservoirs support the diffusion of climate change adaptations;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2023-09-18

5. Operationalizing cultural adaptation to climate change: contemporary examples from United States agriculture;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2023-09-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3