Making better decisions in groups

Author:

Bang Dan12ORCID,Frith Chris D.13

Affiliation:

1. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK

2. Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark

3. Institute of Philosophy, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK

Abstract

We review the literature to identify common problems of decision-making in individuals and groups. We are guided by a Bayesian framework to explain the interplay between past experience and new evidence, and the problem of exploring the space of hypotheses about all the possible states that the world could be in and all the possible actions that one could take. There are strong biases, hidden from awareness, that enter into these psychological processes. While biases increase the efficiency of information processing, they often do not lead to the most appropriate action. We highlight the advantages of group decision-making in overcoming biases and searching the hypothesis space for good models of the world and good solutions to problems. Diversity of group members can facilitate these achievements, but diverse groups also face their own problems. We discuss means of managing these pitfalls and make some recommendations on how to make better group decisions.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 92 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The diversity advantage: An explanatory framework for personality traits;European Journal of Personality;2024-01-18

2. Desarrollo de la comprensión lectora a través de la colaboración y el diálogo;Investigaciones Sobre Lectura;2024-01-02

3. Earlier social information has a stronger influence on judgments;Scientific Reports;2024-01-02

4. Ancient Greek Mathematical Proofs and Metareasoning;Annals of the Canadian Society for History and Philosophy of Mathematics/ Société canadienne d’histoire et de philosophie des mathématiques;2024

5. Expert Judgment in the 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model;Seismological Research Letters;2023-10-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3