Affiliation:
1. School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
2. Cooperative Research Centres for Spatial Information, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Abstract
With the rising incidence of type II diabetes mellitus (DM II) worldwide, methods to identify high-risk geographical areas have become increasingly important. In this comprehensive review following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, we outline spatial methods, outcomes and covariates used in all spatial studies involving outcomes of DM II. A total of 1894 potentially relevant citations were identified. Studies were included if spatial methods were used to explore outcomes of DM II or type I and 2 diabetes combined. Descriptive tables were used to summarize information from included studies. Ten spatial studies conducted in the USA, UK and Europe met selection criteria. Three studies used Bayesian generalized linear mixed modelling (GLMM), three used classic generalized linear modelling, one used classic GLMM, two used geographic information systems mapping tools and one compared case:provider ratios across regions. Spatial studies have been effective in identifying high-risk areas and spatial factors associated with DM II outcomes in the USA, UK and Europe, and would be useful in other parts of the world for allocation of additional services to detect and manage DM II early.
Reference67 articles.
1. International Diabetes Federation. 2014 IDF diabetes atlas: sixth edition. See https://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/update-2014.
2. Uninsured Patients in District of Columbia Hospitals
3. Diabetes UK. 2012 State of the Nation 2012 England. Diabetes. See http://www.diabetes.org.uk/Documents/Reports/State-of-the-Nation-2012.pdf.
4. Is Neighborhood Green Space Associated With a Lower Risk of Type 2 Diabetes? Evidence From 267,072 Australians
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献