Affiliation:
1. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi
2. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, ÖLÇME VE DEĞERLENDİRME BÖLÜMÜ, EĞİTİMDE ÖLÇME VE DEĞERLENDİRME ANABİLİM DALI
Abstract
Currently, research on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) focuses mainly on dichotomous items and cognitive traits (achievement, aptitude, etc.). However, polytomous IRT-based CAT is a promising research area for measuring psychological traits that has attracted much attention. The main purpose of this study is to test the practicality of the polytomous IRT-based CAT and its equivalence with the paper-pencil version. Data were collected from 1449 high school students (45% female), using the paper-pencil version for IRT parameter estimates and CAT simulation studies. For the equivalence study, the research group consisted of 81 students (47% female) who participated in both the paper-pencil and live CAT application. The paper-pencil version of vocational interest inventory consists of 17 factors and 164 items. The simulation study showed that the EAP estimation method and the SE < .500 test termination strategy were superior compared to the other CAT designs. The Item selection did not help to reduce test duration or increase measurement accuracy. As a result, it was found that an area of interest can be assessed with about four items. The results of the live CAT application showed that the estimates of CAT were strongly positively correlated with its paper-pencil version. In addition, the live CAT application increased usability compared to the fixed-length test version by reducing test length by 50% and time by 77%. This study shows that the polytomous IRT-based CAT is applicable and efficient for measuring psychological traits.
Publisher
Egitimde ve Psikolojide Olcme ve Degerlendirme Dergisi
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference67 articles.
1. Abidin, A. Z., Istiyono, E., Fadilah, N., & Dwandaru, W. S. B. (2019). A Computerized Adaptive Test for Measuring the Physics Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 376-383.
2. Achtyes, E. D., Halstead, S., Smart, L., Moore, T., Frank, E., Kupfer, D. J., & Gibbons, R. D. (2015). Validation of Computerized Adaptive Testing in an Outpatient Nonacademic Setting: The VOCATIONS Trial. Psychiatric Services, 1–6. http://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400390
3. Alkhadher, O., Clarke, D. D., & Anderson, N. (1998). Equivalence and predictive validity of paper-and-pencil and computerized adaptive formats of the differential aptitude tests. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71(3), 205–217. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1998.tb00673.x
4. Aybek, E. C., & Çıkrıkçı, R. N. (2018). Kendini değerlendirme envanteri’nin bilgisayar ortamında bireye uyarlanmış test olarak uygulanabilirliği. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 8(50), 117-141.
5. Babcock, B., & Weiss, D. J. (2012). Termination Criteria in Computerized Adaptive Tests: Do Variable - Length CATs Provide Efficient and Effective Measurement? Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1(1), 1–18. http://doi.org/10.7333/1212-0101001