GOLDMAN’S PLURALISTIC APPROACH TO AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE ANDPIET MONDRIAN’S INTUITIVE NEO-PLASTIC ART

Author:

Fallahzadeh Ali, ,Rahbarnia Zahra,

Abstract

The objective of this article is to demonstrate the credibility of the pluralistic approach to aesthetic experience, mainly focused on Goldman's recent argument, in the case of Neo-Plastic paintings which is chosen as the most mature paradigm of pure abstract art created based on the premises of formalism. This article tries to clarify whether the spectator should realize the aesthetic value of pure abstract art based on a formalistic standpoint (as it has been commonly used), or a pluralistic mode: interactive and simultaneous involvement of all mental faculties namely perception, imagination, emotion, and cognition. To achieve the goals of this article, Mondrian's writings will be examined in light of two different viewpoints: formalists’ intuitive approach and Goldman’s pluralistic approach. At the end of this article, it becomes evident that although Mondrian, in several instances in his writings emphasizes the role of intuition in the creation and aesthetic perception of spiritual content (universal beauty as truth) of his Neo-Plastic art, his approach to aesthetic experience, similar to the recent argument of Goldman, is pluralistic; meaning that for appreciation of the aesthetic value of Neo-Plastic paintings all mental faculties, except imagination, are correlatively involved.

Publisher

Global Research & Development Services

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference46 articles.

1. Aesthetic experience regained;Beardsley;The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,1969

2. https://doi.org/10.2307/428903

3. Bell, C. (1914). Art. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company Publishers.

4. Berleant, A. (2000). The aesthetic field: A phenomenology of aesthetic experience. New Zealand: Cybereditions.

5. Bertinetto, A. G. (2015). Art and Aesthetic Experience. Italy, Università di Torino: Comparative Studies in Modernism no.6.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3