Influence of Indwelling Lacrimal Drainage Tube on the Curative Effect of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy

Abstract

Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EES-DCR) has gradually become the main surgical method for treating chronic dacryocystitis. Whether the placement of the lacrimal drainage tube during the operation can improve the operation’s success rate is an issue. This study observes the effect of an indwelling lacrimal drainage tube on the curative effect of EES-DCR in patients with chronic dacryocystitis. The cure rate of the Lacrimal duct drainage tube non-indwelling group A was 93.8% (46/49). The 3 cases failed because of the nasal cavity’s inflammation, which resulted in the adhesion of the anastomotic stoma and the middle turbinate. The cure rate of the Lacrimal drainage tube indwelling group B was 85.7% (42/49). The 7 cases failed because of the excessive proliferation of the tissue around the anastomosis, the hyperplasia of granulation tissue, the shedding of the lacrimal duct drainage tube, the crack of the lacrimal duct, and the premature removal of the lacrimal duct drainage tube caused the contraction of the mucosa around the anastomosis, resulting in the anastomosis obstruction. There was no obvious difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 6 months, 46 cases of the EES-DCR group A had gradually epithelialized anastomoses without granulation tissue growth with the follow up time extension. In the EES-DCR group B, 42 cases of anastomoses were gradually epithelialized without granulation tissue growth. Nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy combined with an indwelling lacrimal duct drainage tube can be used to treat chronic dacryocystitis, but an indwelling lacrimal duct drainage tube has no significant effect on the efficacy of chronic dacryocystitis.