Oxycodone versus morphine for titration analgesia after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in postanesthesia care unit: A prospective, randomized trial

Author:

Zhao Xiyue,Zhou Songyi,Wang Liangrong,Lin Lina,Chen Lei,Zhou Jiahao

Abstract

We want to compare the efficacy and side effects of oxycodone and morphine in the management of postoperative pain by titration in patients who underwent laparoscopic gynecologic surgery because of neglect of postoperative analgesia and rare literature of intravenous oxycodone used in PACU, China. Thirty adult female patients were scheduled for elective laparoscopic gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia. The patients were randomly assigned to either morphine sulfate injection group (Group M, n = 15 cases) or oxycodone hydrochloride injection group (Group O, n = 15 cases). All the patients were given an intravenous PEG nanometer drug delivery system. Furthermore, when they arrived at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), a visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate postoperative pain. Also, the patients were given 3 mg oxycodone or morphine for titration when the pain VAS score was more than 30 mm, and the pain and sedation scores were re-evaluated after 5 minutes. The titration stopped if the VAS score was ≤ 30 mm otherwise the titration continued as per the above method until the VAS score was less than 30 mm. The required titration dosage, times, and time of oxycodone titration were noted and they were all remarkably lower than those of morphine titration group (P < 0.05). The incidence of side effects in Group M was statistically significantly higher in Group O (P < 0.05). More so, oxycodone titration showed faster analgesic effects, less analgesic drug consumption, and lower incidence of adverse complications during postoperative pain management when compared to morphine titration. The reliability and effectiveness of the PEG nanometer drug delivery system were simultaneously proved.

Publisher

American Scientific Publishers

Subject

General Materials Science

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3