Posterior Arch Augmentation (Spinoplasty) before and after Single and Double Interspinous Spacer Introduction at the Same Level: Preventing and Treating the Failure?

Abstract

Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is one of the most common degenerative diseases in elderly patients. Failure of he treatment can occur, generally related to bone remodelling/fracture of spinous processes. PMMA augmentation of the posterior arch (spinoplasty, SP) has recently been proposed in case of neoplastic involvement. This study evaluated the efficacy of SP as a prophylactic treatment before introducing an interspinous spacer (IS). Moreover, we consider the possibility to treat patients who previously underwent IS implants with subsequent failure of the device, by introducing a second spacer at the same level, performing accessory SP. From January 2009 to September 2011, 174 patients with LSCS underwent CT-guided percutaneous IS implant in our department. From January 2011, all patients with osteoporosis underwent prophylactic SP before introducing the spacer. Moreover, in patients with re-stenosis related to bone remodelling and/or fracture, after strengthening the spinous processes with PMMA introduction, a second similar device was introduced to re-open the stenotic spinal canal. In patients with prophylactic treatment before spacer introduction, no restenosis occurred at three to 12 month follow-up. Patients who underwent second spacer implant at the same level after posterior arch augmentation again obtained a resolution of symptoms, and no further bone remodelling had occurred at follow-up controls. In conclusion, prophylactic SP prevents single spacer failure for bone remodelling/fracture, and allows failure repair by introducing a second spacer at the same level.