Author:
Rakshith H S,Suroshe Sachin S,Keerthi M C,Chander Subhash,Roy Diya
Abstract
DNA extraction is a routine step in many insect molecular studies and extraction methods need to be evaluated for their efficiency, cost, and side effects, such as DNA degradation. Individuals of six spotted ladybird beetle, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (F.) were subjected to DNA extraction by the CTAB method and PureLink® Kit. The methods were compared in terms of DNA quantity and quality, cost of materials, and time consumed. The CTAB method resulted in higher DNA yield (ng DNA) at a much lower price and less degradation, as revealed on agarose gels. The PureLink® Kit was the most time-efficient but costliest, and degradation was observed on agarose gels. The DNA samples obtained were tested on agarose gel PCR for six SSRs located in various positions of the beetle’s genome. The results revealed that DNA isolated from the CTAB method showed successful amplifications, but the PureLink® Kit method did not show any amplification. These evaluations guide the choice of DNA extraction methods from C. sexmaculata beetles.
Publisher
The Entomological Society of India
Reference19 articles.
1. Aljanabi S M, Martinez I. 1997. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Research 25(22): 4692-4693.
2. Chen M, Zhu Y Y, Tao J, Luo Y Q. 2008. Methodological comparison of DNA extraction from Holcocerrus hippophaecolus (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) for AFLP analysis. Forestry Studies in China 10(3): 189-192.
3. Chomczynski P, Wilfinger W, Mackey K. 1998. Isolation of genomic DNA from human, animal, and plant samples with DNAzol reagents. Biotechnology International 8: 185-188.
4. Clark T L, Meinke L J, Foster J E. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of Diabrotica beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) inferred from analysis of combined mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Insect Molecular Biology 10(4): 303-314.
5. Crouse J, Amorese D. 1987. Ethanol precipitation: ammonium acetate as an alternative to sodium acetate. Focus 9(2): 3-5.