Predictors of poor outcomes in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Author:

Soe A. K.1,Avdeev S. N.2,Nuralieva G. S.2,Gaynitdinova V. V.3,Chuchalin A. G.1

Affiliation:

1. N.I.Pirogov Federal Russian State National Research Medical University, Healthcare Ministry of Russia

2. I.M.Sechenov Federal First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Healthcare Ministry of Russia Federal Pulmonology Research Institute, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia

3. I.M.Sechenov Federal First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Healthcare Ministry of Russia

Abstract

The aimof this study was to identify predictors of poor outcomes in patients hospitalized for severe acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).Methods. This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in Pulmonology Department of a city hospital in 2015 – 2016 and involved patients  hospitalized for severe AECOPD. Patients were divided according to outcomes. Poor  outcomes included at least one of the followings: the need in invasive (IMV)  or non-invasive (NIV) ventilation, admission to ICU, in-hospital death and COPD- related readmission during 2 months. Demographic, clinical, laboratory  parameters, pulmonary function tests and blood gas analysis were analyzed;  different multidimensional prognostic scores were also evaluated and compared.Results. Of 121 patients included, a poor outcome had occurred in 45 patients (37%). Among them, NIV was required in 21 (17%), IMV in 8 (6%), and admission to ICU in 16 patients (13%); death was registered in 6 patients (5%) and  readmission in 27 (22%) of the patients. Patients with poor outcomes were  admitted more frequently by ambulance (62% vs 40%; p = 0.003), more often  were admitted to a hospital for AECOPD in the previous year (69% vs 45%; p =  0.0006), and had lower pH (p = 0.001), lower PaO2 (p = 0.001), higher PaCO2 (p  = 0.001), and a worse score on several prognostic scales such as APACHE II (13.9  ± 5.4 vs 7.8 ± 3.6; p = 0.001), DECAF (2.4 ± 0.6 vs 1.5 ± 0.6; p = 0.001),  BODEx (5.6 ± 1.8 vs 3.9 ± 1.1; p = 0.001), DOSE (2.9 ± 1.5 vs 2.2 ± 1.2; p =  0.029), and ADO (4.9 ± 1.5 vs 4.3 ± 1.3; p = 0.015) at admission. They more  frequently received O2 therapy (87% vs 46%; p = 0.001) and had longer hospital  stay (19.2 ± 6.2 days vs 12.5 ± 1.8 days; p = 0.001). Conclusions. Hypercapnia, hypoxemia and worse prognostic scores on admission predicted poor outcome in patients hospitalized for AECOPD during the previous year.

Publisher

Scientific and Practical Reviewed Journal Pulmonology

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3