Affiliation:
1. Indiana University Bloomington
Abstract
This self-study explored my theoretical and practical understandings of my role and responsibilities regarding preparing future science educators who are globally competent. Specifically, I focused on how I changed my approach to teaching and addressing global competencies during science instruction as a science teacher educator. Using grounded theory, open coding, and the constant comparison method allowed for a comprehensive and rigorous data analysis, including journal entries, critical friend meetings, concept maps, and student artifacts. The findings of the study underscore a transformative shift in my journey toward becoming a globally competent instructor as I strived to cultivate global competence in my students. The findings and subsequent implications inform the field of science education regarding teacher educators’ role in preparing teachers to be critical change agents.
Reference66 articles.
1. Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-2
2. Aikenhead, G. (1992). The integration of STS into science education. Theory Into Practice, 31(1), 27–35.
3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543521
4. Allender, J., & Manke, M. P. (2004, July). Evoking self in self-study: The analysis of artifacts. In Journeys of hope: Risking self-study in a diverse world. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices (Vol. 27). Herstmonceux Castle, East Sussex, England.
5. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Pocket guide to the 2011 annual meeting. Washington, DC: Author.