ABD HUKUKU UYARINCA OTONOM ARAÇLAR ÇAĞINDA TEKEFFÜLLER, FEDERAL HUKUKUN ÜSTÜNLÜĞÜ VE FEDERAL MODEL KURUMLARIN ROLÜ

Author:

KASAP Atilla1

Affiliation:

1. ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HUKUK FAKÜLTESİ

Abstract

Autonomous vehicle (AV) technology promises society many social, economic, and environmental benefits. It is crucial to examine the legal environment behind this breakthrough technology in order to pave the way for continuous innovation. Under US law, where the AV technology is most regulated, this Article delves into three critical legal issues AVs will face: i) law of warranties, ii) preemption of state common law claims, and iii) the role of federal modal agencies. This Article argues that the role of warranty claims would be limited because most AVs will not be sold to the public in the first years, meaning that there will be no express or implied warranties. Since previous preemption cases related to motor vehicles involved specific designs, this Article asserts that performance-oriented standards––assessing whether an AV drives more safely than a conventional vehicle––will work around unpredictable preemption questions. Moreover, if the threat of future litigation becomes too great for AV manufacturers, federal preemption could limit AV manufacturers’ liability for compensation to injured plaintiffs. Last, although limited budgets and staffing levels make modal agencies’ inaction to date understandable, this Article cautions that the current research phase should not last too long. Otherwise, agency inaction will hamper the safe introduction of AVs.

Publisher

Hacettepe University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. ABRAHAM, Kenneth S. & RABIN, Robert L., “Automated Vehicles and Manufacturer Responsibility for Accidents: A New Legal Regime for a New Era”, Virginia Law Review, Year: 2019, Vol: 105, Issue:1

2. ANDERSON, James M. / KALRA, Nidhi / STANLEY, Karlyn D. et al., Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers, RAND Corporation, California, United States, 2016.

3. ATWELL, Barbara L., “Products Liability and Preemption: A Judicial Framework”, Buffalo Law Review, Year: 1991, Vol: 39, Issue:1.

4. AUSNESS, Richard C., “Preemption of State Tort Law by Federal Safety Statutes: Supreme Court Preemption Jurisprudence Since Cipollone”, Kentucky Law Journal, Year: 2003, Vol: 92, No: 4.

5. BROCK, Caitlin, “Where We’re Going, We Don’t Need Drivers: The Legal Issues and Liability Implications of Automated Vehicle Technology”, University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Year: 2015, Vol:83, Issue:3.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3