Randomised clinical trial in umbilical sepsis: A comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes of umbilectomy and umbilicus-retaining procedure

Author:

Raj Andrews Felix Anand,Ajmal Imran Thariq,Andiyappan Mahadevan,Chandran Hemagayathri,Ibrahim Shahid

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyse the postoperative outcomes between umbilectomy and the umbilicus-retaining procedure in patients presenting with umbilical sepsis. Patients presenting to the surgical clinic with umbilical sepsis were randomised into two groups of 25 patients each based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Postoperative factors such as pain score, wound infection, recurrence, hospital stay, and cosmetic satisfaction were analysed during follow-up. The parameters observed were statistically analysed using the chi-square test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The mean age at surgery in both groups was similar (48 vs. 49, p=0.9191). Based on the pain score after surgery, there is a significant difference (p=0.0183) between the two groups, with higher pain reported in patients undergoing the umbilicus-retaining procedure. Considering wound infection as a parameter, the statistical significance is less (p= 0.096). Hospital stay was observed in both groups, and there were no significant differences (p=0.7055). The study population consisted of 23 men and 27 women. Cosmetic satisfaction of patients was assessed, and no statistical significance was found (p=0.644) between the two groups, irrespective of gender. Recurrence of symptoms was observed more in the group where the umbilicus is retained (p=0.0073). Considering all the parameters and their statistical significance, it is concluded that postoperative outcomes were comparable in both groups of patients. The results of this study provide insights for surgeons into the concept of retaining or removing the umbilicus and its impact on postoperative morbidity of patients presenting with umbilical sepsis

Publisher

Scientific Journals Publishing House

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3