Abstract
In archaeology, the concept of identity is investigated with a clear focus on material culture, while architecture has often been excluded from this narrative, or when included, the general outlook gravitates towards more contemporary case studies. This article argues that iconoclasm, cultural appropriation and architectural destruction are not issues only concerning the recent past, but they are a diachronic phenomenon present endemically in a variety of case studies that pertain to archaeological contexts.
Publisher
Archaeopress Publishing Ltd
Reference67 articles.
1. Anagnostopoulos, A. 2016. Cosmopolitanism or constitutive violence? The creation of ‘Turkish’ Iraklion, in R. Bryant (ed.), Post-Ottoman Coexistence. Sharing Space in the Shadow of Conflict: 86–106. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
2. Anastasopoulos, A., E. Kolovos and M. Sariyannis 2008. Introduction, in E. Brouskare (ed.) Transl. E. Fowden. Ottoman Architecture in Greece: 18–44. Athens: Hellenic Ministry of Culture.
3. Archer, J. 2005. Social theory of space: Architecture and the production of self, culture, and society. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 64 (4): 430–433.
4. Arnold, D. Y. 1991. The house of earth-bricks and Inka Stones: Gender, memory and cosmos in Qaqachaka. Journal of Latina American Lore 17: 3–69.
5. Ascherson, N. 2005. Cultural Destruction by War and its impact on group identities, in N. Stanley-Price (ed.) Cultural Heritage in Postwar Recovery. Papers from the ICCROM FORUM held on October 4–6, 2005: 17–25. Rome: ICCROM Conservation Studies 6.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献