Abstract
The study follows a worker-based approach and distinguishes wage workers and self-employed workers. Our hypotheses stress the role of head worker characteristics in explaining the probability of a household being poor. Using data from the Vietnam Household Living Standard Survey 2014 (VHLSS 2014), we estimate a probit regression model. The result shows that households with the head are informal wage earners, have the highest risk of living in poverty, while with the head are formal wage earners enjoy the least. The effects of self-employed households fall between those two extremes. The weaknesses of informal employment are reflected in four main aspects: low labour quality, low education level, low working time (hours/year), and lack of social insurance or labour protection. The findings can serve as evidence for formulating effective policies related to poverty reduction.
Publisher
Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research
Subject
Marketing,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference42 articles.
1. Bairagya, I. (2012). Employment in India’s informal sector: size, patterns, growth and determinants. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 17(4), 593–615.
2. Bastos, A., Casaca, S. F., Nunes, F., & Pereirinh, J. (2009). Women and poverty: A gender-sensitive approach. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(No.5), 764-778.
3. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. University of Chicago Press: University of Chicago Press.
4. Buddelmeyer, H., & Cai, L. (2009). Interrelated Dynamics of Health and Poverty in Australia. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 4602.
5. Chanfreau, J., & Burchardt, T. (2008). Equivalence scales: rationales, uses and assumptions. Retrieved from https://www2.gov.scot/resource/doc/933/0079961.pdf
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献