Theorising Asset Forfeiture in Ireland

Author:

Campbell Liz1

Affiliation:

1. BCL, LLM (NUI), PhD candidate, University College Cork and lecturer in law, University of Aberdeen

Abstract

Various alterations to the Irish legal system have been effected in a bid to counter organised crime, the most radical of which was the introduction of civil forfeiture in 1996. This article examines the forfeiture process carried out by the Criminal Assets Bureau and seeks to analyse it from a theoretical perspective. Civil forfeiture may be regarded as embodying a move away from due process towards crime control, given the avoidance of traditional protections in the criminal process by its location in the civil realm. Moreover, the process may be characterised as an ‘apersonal means of tackling crime’, in which emphasis is laid on the non-moral and regulatory aspects of the law. This article further contends that civil forfeiture represents an adaptation to reality in which the State reconfigures the legislative framework so as to facilitate more readily the suppression of organised crime.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference109 articles.

1. For a useful compilation of crime statistics in Ireland see I. O'Donnell, E. O'Sullivan, and D. Healy (eds)Crime and Punishment in Ireland, 1922 to 2003: A Statistical Sourcebook(Institute of Public Administration: Dublin, 2005).

2. While from 1972 to 1991 18.9 per cent of homicides in Ireland were committed with a firearm, this figure increased to 27.3 per cent in the period between 1992 and 1996. See E. Dooley,Homicide in Ireland 1972-1991(Stationery Office: Dublin, 1995) 26; E. Dooley,Homicide in Ireland1992-1996 (Stationery Office: Dublin, 2001) 15, table 10.

3. In Dooley's study of homicides from 1992 to 1996, there was a 20 per cent conviction rate (all for murder) for the homicides which were related to gangland/organised crime, in comparison with 57.6 per cent for the study as a whole: above n. 2 at 16-17, table 12.

4. Ibid. at 15, table 10.

5. Dail Debates, 2 July 1996, vol. 467, col. 2473,perMr O'Dea TD.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Public policies against criminal assets in mexico: challenges and opportunities from the north border states;Crime, Law and Social Change;2021-06-02

2. Conflict of Interest for Corruption and Abuse of Public Power;Handbook of Research on Theory and Practice of Financial Crimes;2021

3. Historic analogs of civil confiscation of unexplained wealth – the case of Bulgaria;Journal of Financial Crime;2020-01-10

4. How far is too far? Theorising non-conviction-based asset forfeiture;International Journal of Law in Context;2015-11-02

5. Conflict of interest in European public law;Journal of Financial Crime;2013-10-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3