1. S. Glueck,Mental Disorder and the Criminal Law(Little Brown: Boston, 1925) 187-8, cited in C. Slobogin, `An End to Insanity: Recasting the Role of Mental Disability in Criminal Cases', Olin Working Paper No. 00-3, University of Southern California Law School, 2000, 1.
2. For further discussion of tests such asM'Naghten,Durham, the American Law Institute--Model Penal Code, the Irresistible Impulse Test and the Justly Responsible Test, see D. H. J. Hermann and Y. S. Sor, `Convicting or Confining? Alternative Directions in Insanity Law Reform: Guilty but Mentally Ill versus New Rules for Release of Insanity Acquittees' [1983] BYUL Rev 499, 508-25; M. S. Moore,Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship(Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1984) 218-20.
3. Hermann and Sor, above n. 2 at 526.
4. H. Fingarette,The Meaning of Criminal Insanity(University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, 1972) 211. Unfortunately, space precludes discussion of this definition, but see ibid. at 203-15 for further elucidation. The issue of rationality in the context of insanity is discussed ibid. at 179-94.
5. J. Goldstein and J. Katz, `Abolish the Insanity Defense --Why Not?' (1963) 72 Yale LJ 853 at 859-62.