Probability, Explanation and Inference: A Reply-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Probability, Explanation and Inference: A Reply

Published:2007-10 Issue:4 Volume:11 Page:307-317
ISSN:1365-7127
Container-title:The International Journal of Evidence & Proof
language:en
Short-container-title:The International Journal of Evidence & Proof

Author:

Allen Ronald J.¹,Pardo Michael S.²

Affiliation:

1. Wigmore Professor of Law, Northwestern University; Fellow, Procedural Law Research Center, China Political Science and Law University

2. Assistant Professor, University of Alabama School of Law

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Sociology and Political Science

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1350/ijep.2007.11.4.307

Reference27 articles.

1. Both approaches involve inductive inferences; the probability approach employs enumerative inferences and the explanation approach employs abductive inferences.

2. We discuss this conclusion and these issues in more detail in Michael S. Pardo and Ronald J. Allen, `Juridical Proof and the Best Explanation'Law and Philosophy(forthcoming).

3. Nance, `The Reference Class Problem and Mathematical Models of Inference', above at 259.

4. Ibid. at 269.

5. Dale A. Nance and Scott B. Morris, `An Empirical Assessment of Presentation Formats for Trace Evidence with a Relatively Large and Quantifiable Random Match Probability' (2002) 42Jurimetrics Journal403, 445.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reasonable Doubt, Robust Evidential Probability and the Unknown;Criminal Law and Philosophy;2023-06-24

2. Reasonable Doubt from Unconceived Alternatives;Erkenntnis;2022-05-24

3. Relevance, probative value, and explanatory considerations;The International Journal of Evidence & Proof;2019-01-17

4. Relative plausibility and its critics;The International Journal of Evidence & Proof;2019-01-03

5. Making forensic science fit for justice;Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences;2017-05-11