1. Alexander, Henry (1928) “The Language of the Salem Witchcraft Trials,” American Speech 3, 390-400.
2. Archer, Dawn (2002) “‘Can Innocent People Be Guilty?’ A Sociopragmatic Analysis of Examination Transcripts from the Salem Witchcraft Trials,” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 3, 1-30.
3. Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan (1977) “Diachronic Relations among Speech-based and Written Registers in English,” To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, 253-275, Modern Language Society, Helsinki.
4. Boyer, Paul and Stephen Nissenbaum (1977) The Salem Witchcraft Papers: Verbatim Transcripts of the Legal Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Outbreak of 1692. I-III, Da Capo Press, New York.
5. Boyer, Paul and Stephen Nissenbaum, eds. (1993) Salem-village Witchcraft: A Documentary Record of Local Conflict in Colonial New England, Northeastern University Press, Boston.