Author:
Qingbiao Meng,Mohd Raslim Faraziera,Mansor Nur Syaimasyaza
Abstract
The urban community, which is the fundamental unit of the city, has recently been governed inefficiently and extensively. Common occurrences like the dirty-disorderly-disparity appearance and slow operations of local public facilities have become a barrier to the growth of resilient urban oasis. The concept of lean governance emerges in the community retrofit at the right time under Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) to incorporate the “Green, Ecological and Low-Carbon” philosophy in the life cycle of the urban green community. In the life cycle of a green community retrofit, there are a variety of stakeholders whose objectives and interests are both in line with and at odds with one another, particularly during the community retrofit or construction management phases. Rebuilding a lean governance performance evaluation system is the goal to increase effectiveness and appease stakeholders in community retrofit under a PPP model. Principal component analysis (PCA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) are used to build the input-output performance evaluation index system of the lean governance of the urban community. It compensates for the lack of domestic and international research on the assessment of the lean obsolete community governance level. In addition, the paper uses eighteen urban old communities in China that were renovated under PPP model as the subject of an empirical study. It uses a quantitative model to assess the level of lean governance in these communities and offers recommendations for performance enhancement. To successfully implement the new-type urban green community retrofit under the PPP model, a co-governance mechanism is established.
Publisher
Malaysian Institute of Planners
Reference29 articles.
1. Nguyen, M. D. (2022). Public-Private Partnerships in Post-socialist Urban Governance: Comparative Institutional Change in Leipzig, Shanghai, and Ho Chi Minh City. In Rethinking Asian Capitalism: The Achievements and Challenges of Vietnam Under Doi Moi (pp. 131-155). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
2. Fikfak, A., Bugaric, B., Niksic, M., Mujkic, S., Konjar, M., Grom, J. P., ... & Plicanic, S. (2019). Public-Private Partnerships for Urban Development: Stakeholder View in Solvenia. Eur. Pub. L., 25, 325.
3. De Paula, P. V., Marques, R. C., & Gonçalves, J. M. (2023). Public–Private Partnerships in Urban Regeneration Projects: A Review. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 149(1), 04022056.
4. Sun B.D., Zhong C.H., … & Han Q., (2023). Research progress, transformation challenges and path considerations for green and low-carbon retrofitting of old communities. Urban Development Studies ,30(06):12-17.
5. Shen L., Zhao W.C., Mu Y., (2019). Innovation of PPP Mode of Existing Residential Building Green Retrofit from the Perspective of Community Participation,36(01):8-15+23.