QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN ASSESSING RAINWATER HARVESTING IMPLEMENTATION FIDELITY FOR RELIABLE DATA
Author:
Mohd Latif Hafizah,Mohamed Norazida,Donyavi Sohrab,Samsudin Noor Sahidah
Abstract
Assessing local councils’ adherence to rainwater harvesting policy regulated in the by-laws is critical to the success of water conservation efforts. However, there are certain challenges that must be addressed in this assessment. This paper highlights the aforementioned challenges and provides recommendations for future research. The research used a qualitative approach, employing six distinct methods to obtain more robust and reliable data: (i) desk study, (ii) document review, (iii) interviews, (iv) observation, (v) self-analysis questions and (vi) focus group discussion. The success of the implementation-focused research was based on a defined direction of assessment, eligible participants and sites, suitable methods, access to reliable data, robust analysis and writing proficiency. This paper suggests that future search should focus on establishing relevant skills, building relationships with the participants, defining concepts and exploring alternative data sources. Assessing implementation fidelity was not easy because it necessitated substantial resources to draw meaningful conclusions about the extent to which the rainwater harvesting policy was delivered. Addressing qualitative research challenges in assessing rainwater harvesting implementation could enable researchers to suggest implementers on making more informed decisions in attaining Sustainable Development Goal 6.
Publisher
Malaysian Institute of Planners
Reference22 articles.
1. Allen, J. D., Linnan, L. A., & Emmons, K. M. (2012). Fidelity and Its Relationship to Implementation Effectiveness, Adaptation, and Dissemination. In Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science into practice (pp. 213–222). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.001.0001. 2. An, M., Dusing, S. C., Harbourne, R. T., Sheridan, S. M., & START-Play Consortium. (2020). What Really Works in Intervention? Using Fidelity Measures to Support Optimal Outcomes. Physical Therapy, 100(5), 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa006 3. Azis, S. S. A., Razali, M. N. M., Maimun, N. H. A., Yusoff, N. S. M., Rahman, M. S. A., & Zulkifli, N. A. A. (2021). AN ANALYSIS ON THE EFFICIENCY OF GREEN ROOF IN MANAGING URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 19. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i17.991 4. Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40 5. Colquhoun, H., Leeman, J., Michie, S., Lokker, C., Bragge, P., Hempel, S., McKibbon, K. A., Peters, G.-J. Y., Stevens, K. R., Wilson, M. G., & Grimshaw, J. (2014). Towards a common terminology: A simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies. Implementation Science, 9(1), 781. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-51
|
|