Author:
Mohd Muhiddin Ahmad Afiq,Mohd Isa Haryati,Md Sakip Siti Rasidah,Mohd Nor Othman,Sedhu Daljeet Singh
Abstract
Green initiatives had been taken seriously by all parties including higher education institutions. Many researchers believed that university is an essential institution to find solutions to the complexities of current global environment issues. Indeed, university should be the key hubs for innovation and environmental education, as well as the execution of human behavioural change towards sustainability. Most universities worldwide nowadays including Malaysia starts to implement various green campus initiatives to combat global warming and fostering sustainable campus growth. However, there are several challenges encountered throughout the implementation. Thus, this research attempts to examine on the current green campus implementation practices in the Malaysian public universities. Three Malaysian public universities participating in the UI GreenMetric 2021 World University Ranking had been chosen as the case study. Each university is represented by a senior representative to participate in the semi-structured interview conducted. The interview questions were constructed based on the most common and relevant chosen indicators from all six categories of UI GreenMetric. The research findings revealed that although most Malaysian public universities had implemented green initiatives as outlined in the UI GreenMetric, numerous challenges occurred. But there are solutions to push green campus initiatives to the forefront. The university management and the communities should play major roles towards realizing Sustainable Development Goals, as well as assuring more sustainable practices in the future.
Publisher
Malaysian Institute of Planners
Subject
Urban Studies,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference13 articles.
1. Berglund, E., Westerling, R., & Lytsy, P. (2017). Housing Type and Neighbourhood Safety Behaviour Predicts Self-rated Health, Psychological Well-being and Frequency of Recent Unhealthy Days: A Comparative Cross-sectional Study of the General Population in Sweden. Planning Practice & Research, 32(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2017.1374706
2. Darul Nafis Abas, Rozana Zakaria, Eeydzah Aminudin, Nurul Asmiera Ab Lah, Nur Syafiqah Aini Mohamad Nor Sharin, & Shaza Rina Sahamir. (2021). Issues and challenges of joint management body in high-rise residential facilities management: The developers. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(5), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2021.091304
3. Evans, G. W., Kantrowitz, E., & Eshelman, P. (2002). Housing Quality and Psychological Well-Being Among the Elderly Population. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(4), P381–P383. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.4.P381
4. Hashim, H. A., Sapri, M., & Shareena Azis, Ab, S. (2019). Strategic Facilities Management Functions For Public Private Partnership (Ppp) Healthcare Services In Malaysia. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 17(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v17i9.584
5. Khalid, M. S., Ahmad, A. H., Zakaria, R., Rozita Arshad, & Pon, Y. (2017). Towards Strengthening Building Maintenance and Management by Joint Management Bodies (Jmb) in High Rise/Stratified Housing in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 7(4), 239–242. http://www.ijssh.org/vol7/827-HI0004.pdf
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献