Implementing an integrated molecular classification for gastric cancer from endoscopic biopsies using on-slide tests
-
Published:2024-07-15
Issue:2
Volume:65
Page:257-265
-
ISSN:1220-0522
-
Container-title:Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Rom J Morphol Embryol
Author:
,Costache Simona,Baltan Adelina, ,Diaz McLinn Sofia, ,Pegoraro Mattia, ,de Havilland Rebecca, ,Porter Matthew, ,Lerga Ana, ,Thomas Teresa, ,Chefani Alina Elena,
Abstract
The availability of more effective biological therapy can improve outcomes of gastric cancer (GC), but most patients do not have access to personalized treatment. GC molecular classification helps identify patients suitable for specific therapies and provides useful prognostic information. To date, only a small number of patients have access to molecular classification. We proposed a working molecular classification that can be delivered using on-slide tests available in most histopathology laboratories. We used eight on-slide tests [in situ hybridization (ISH) for Epstein–Barr virus-encoded small ribonucleic acid (EBER) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MutL homolog 1 (MLH1), PMS1 homolog 2 (PMS2), MutS homolog 2 (MSH2), MutS homolog 6 (MSH6), E-cadherin, β-catenin and p53] to classify GC into one of six categories: GC associated with Epstein–Barr virus (GC-EBV), GC mismatch repair deficient (GC-dMMR), GC with epithelial–mesenchymal transition (GC-EMT), GC with chromosomal instability (GC-CIN), GC genomically stable (GC-GS) and GC not otherwise specified (GC-NOS)/indeterminate. The classification has provision also for current and future on-slide companion diagnostic (CDx) tests necessary to select specific biological therapies and, as proof of principle, in this study we used three CDx tests currently required for the management of GC [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) 22C3 and Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2)]. This paper describes the necessary tissue pathways and laboratory workflow and assesses the feasibility of using this classification prospectively on small endoscopic biopsies of gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This work demonstrates that such molecular classification can be implemented in the context of a histopathology diagnostic routine with little impact on turnaround times and laboratory capacity. The widespread adoption of a molecular classification for GC will help refine prognosis and guide the choice of more appropriate biological therapy for these patients.
Publisher
Societatea Romana de Morfologie
Reference50 articles.
1. "[1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 2. [2] Rawla P, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of gastric cancer: global trends, risk factors and prevention. Prz Gastroenterol, 2019, 14(1):26-38. https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2018.80001 3. [3] Hu X, Wang Z, Wang Q, Chen K, Han Q, Bai S, Du J, Chen W. Molecular classification reveals the diverse genetic and prognostic features of gastric cancer: a multi-omics consensus ensemble clustering. Biomed Pharmacother, 2021, 144:112222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112222 4. [4] Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature, 2014, 513(7517):202-209. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13480 5. [5] Cristescu R, Lee J, Nebozhyn M, Kim KM, Ting JC, Wong SS, Liu J, Yue YG, Wang J, Yu K, Ye XS, Do IG, Liu S, Gong L, Fu J, Jin JG, Choi MG, Sohn TS, Lee JH, Bae JM, Kim ST, Park SH, Sohn I, Jung SH, Tan P, Chen R, Hardwick J, Kang WK, Ayers M, Hongyue D, Reinhard C, Loboda A, Kim S, Aggarwal A. Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Nat Med, 2015, 21(5):449-456. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3850
|
|