Affiliation:
1. Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia
Abstract
The article considers the post-Soviet development of rural Dagestan. The research is based on microscale municipal socioeconomic statistical data in the context of settlements, field observations and the results of in-depth and expert interviews conducted by the authors during three expeditions to the Republic of Dagestan in 2020–2022. Transformation processes in mountainous territories occur under the simultaneous conditions of natural-geographical, central-peripheral factors of transformation and demographic factors. Incomplete demographic transition combined with the increased role of ethnic traditionalism slow down the processes of modernization of society. Along with the features typical for other regions of Russia (for example, the reduction of workplaces in the agricultural sector, rural depopulation, increased population mobility), the transformation of Dagestan rural areas has its own characteristics. The territorial combination of these regional factors results in a significant variety of types of rural areas at the municipal level. For example, the orographic multiplicity of Dagestan significantly complicates the typical central-peripheral picture of the lowland regions of Russia. Along with suburban, there are two more types of stable rural municipalities—foothill areas that allow you to engage in both agriculture and other activities and areas in the mid-mountain basins, in which the migration outflow of residents is compensated by an inflow from mountain villages. The article presents the author’s version of the typologization of rural Dagestan based on the basic criteria—the position of the district in the “center–periphery” system and belonging to the geomorphological region. The selected subtypes are combined into the main types, considering the economic and demographic characteristics of the territory. Scenarios of the socioeconomic transformation of Dagestan rural areas in the post-Soviet period are studied on the key districts for different physiographic macro-regions of Dagestan: Akhtynsky, Botlikhsky, Karabudakhkentsky, Kizlyarsky, and Tsumadinsky. Trajectories of transformation of Dagestan rural territories in the post-Soviet period are formulated: shrinkage, inertial development, and modernization.
Publisher
The Russian Academy of Sciences
Reference35 articles.
1. Абдурахманов Г.М., Атаев З.В., Мурзаканова Л.З. Ландшафтно-бассейновая организация устойчивого развития горной полиэтнической территории Дагестана // Юг России: экология, развитие. 2006. № 4. С. 31–34.
2. Аверкиева К.В. Сельская местность Нечерноземья: депопуляция и возможные пути адаптации к новым условиям // Вопросы географии. Сб. 135. География населения и социальная география. М.: Изд. дом “Кодекс”, 2013. С. 108–125.
3. Алексеев А.И., Имангулов Л.Р. Сельская местность Башкирии: преобладающие типы и особенности трансформации в постсоветский период // Крестьяноведение. 2022. Т. 7. № 4. С. 107–130. https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2022-7-4-109-132
4. Атаев З.В. Физико-географическое районирование Дагестана. Махачкала: ДГПУ, 1997. 50 с.
5. Баденков Ю.П. Жизнь в горах: природное и культурное разнообразие – разнообразие моделей развития. М.: ГЕОС, 2017. 477 с.