Association of Siderite with Iron Sulfides and Silicates in Rocks of Mikheevskoe Cu(Mo,Au) Porphyry Deposit (Southern Urals)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Association of Siderite with Iron Sulfides and Silicates in Rocks of Mikheevskoe Cu(Mo,Au) Porphyry Deposit (Southern Urals)

Published:2023-07-01 Issue:4 Volume:65 Page:354-368
ISSN:0016-7770
Container-title:Геология рудных месторождений
language:
Short-container-title:Geologiâ rudnyh mestoroždenij

Author:

Pribavkin S. V.¹,Soroka E. I.¹,Azovskova O. B.¹,Smoleva I. V.²,Leonova L. V.¹,Gottman I. A.¹,Sustavov S. G.³,Rovnushkin M. Yu.¹

Affiliation:

1. The Federal State Institution of Science the Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry

2. Federal Research Center «Komi Science Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences» Institute of Geology named after Academician N. P. Yushkin of Komi Science Center of UB RAS (IG Komi SC UB RAS)

3. Ural State Mining University of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The mineral association of siderite with Cu–Fe sulfides, cronstedtite, and goethite were first recognized when studying the Mikheevskoe Cu(Mo,Au)–porphyry deposit. This association is confined to fault zones, where it fills a network of mineralized fractures developed on porphyry- and argillizite-type ores. Minerals of this association were also identified in some argillizite samples of this deposit. The formation conditions of this mineral association and its relation to the evolution of the Late Paleozoic porphyry system or other endogenic–exogenic processes manifested during the subsequent geological history of the study area were studied. The integrated research included microprobe analysis and the measurement of O and C stable isotopes in minerals of the studied association in the “Geoanalitik” (Yekaterinburg) and “Geonauka” (Syktyvkar) Centers for Collective Use. The study of mineral compositions and their relationships indicates that the studied mineral association deposited at temperature of about 70° C from neutral or low-acid solutions HS–,13C with varying HS–, and aSiO2 (aq) contents. The measurements of .13C (from –5.5 to –18.2‰) and 18O (from 20.4 to 33.4‰) values in siderite made it possible to calculate the composition of a mineral-forming fluid. It was established that such a fluid has the following parameters: .18O H2O from –3 to +10‰ and 13C CO2 from 15 to –28‰. It could correspond to magmatogenic water fluids mixed with Corg-bearing surface water. Based on the obtained results, it is suggested that this mineral association is related to argillizites, the development of which occurred at the last stage of endogenic mineral formation at the Mikheevskoe deposit. Nevertheless, it is not excluded that it may be related with other low-T hydrothermal processes at the stage of Meso-Cenozoic tectonomagmatic activation of the Urals. There is no evidence of the relation of the studied mineral association with weathering crusts

Publisher

The Russian Academy of Sciences

Reference56 articles.

1. Азовскова О.Б., РовнушкинМ.Ю., Халилова А.Ф. Характерные черты аргиллизитового метасоматоза в продуктивных гранитоидах Михеевского Сu-порфирового месторождения, Южный Урал // Граниты и эволюция земли: мантия и кора в гранитообразовании: Матер. III междунар. геол. конф. Екатеринбург, 2017. С. 6–8.

2. Андреев Б.С. Пирит золоторудных месторождений. М.: Наука, 1992. 143 с.

3. Баранников А.Г. Гипогенно-гипергенный тип золотого оруденения на Урале // Известия УГГУ. 1998. Вып. 8. С. 94–98.

4. Баранников А.Г., Азовскова О.Б. Золотоносные объекты гипогенно-гипергенного типа на Урале. Конвергентность признаков их отличия от рудоносных кор выветривания // Известия УГГУ. 2017. Вып. 2 (46). С. 13–22.

5. Баранников А.Г., Угрюмов А.Н. Проблемы эндогенного золотого рудогенеза мезозоя Урала // Литосфера. 2003. № 1. С. 13–26.