Comparison of СO<sub>2</sub> Content in the Atmosphere of St. Petersburg According to Numerical Modelling and Observations
-
Published:2023-05-01
Issue:3
Volume:59
Page:322-335
-
ISSN:0002-3515
-
Container-title:Известия Российской академии наук. Физика атмосферы и океана
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Izvestiâ Akademii nauk SSSR. Fizika atmosfery i okeana
Author:
Nerobelov G. M.12, Timofeyev Yu. M.1, Smyshlyaev S. P.3, Foka S. Ch.1, Imhasin H. H.1
Affiliation:
1. Saint-Petersburg State University 2. SPC RAS – Scientific Research Centre for Ecological Safety, Russian Academy of Sciences 3. Russian State Hydrometeorological University
Abstract
Due to the increase in CO2 content in the Earth’s atmosphere, which is highly dependent on anthropogenic emissions of CO2, quality of emission estimation should be improved. Advanced experiment-based methods of the CO2 anthropogenic emission estimation are built on solution of an inverse problem using highly-accurate measurements of CO2 content and numerical models of transport and chemistry in the atmosphere. The accuracy of such models greatly determines errors of the emission estimations. In a current study temporal variations of column-average CO2 content in an atmospheric layer from surface to the height of ~70–75 km (XCO2) in the Russian megapolis of St. Petersburg during Jan 2019–Mar 2020 simulated by WRF-Chem model and measured by IR Fourier-transform spectrometer Bruker EM27/SUN are compared. The research has demonstrated that the WRF-Chem model simulates well the observed temporal variation of XCO2 in the area of St. Petersburg (correlation coefficient of ~0.95). However, using CarbonTracker v2022-1 data as chemical boundary conditions, the model overestimates XCO2 relative to the observations significantly during almost the whole period of investigation – systematic difference and standard deviation of the difference are 4.2 and 1.9 ppm (1 and 0.5%). A correction of the chemical boundary conditions which is based on analysis of a relation between near-surface wind direction and XCO2 variation notably decreases the systematic difference between the modelled and observed data (almost by a factor of 2). The XCO2 variation by the observations and modelling with uncorrected chemical boundary conditions are in a better agreement during vegetation season. Probably this is related to the compensation of the systematic difference by inaccuracies in estimated biogenic contribution. Hence, the reason of the still existing mean difference between the modelled and observed data can be inaccuracies in setting chemical boundary conditions for upper troposphere and in estimating how biosphere influences CO2 content.
Publisher
The Russian Academy of Sciences
Reference41 articles.
1. Alberti Carlos, Qiansi Tu, Frank Hase, Maria V. Makarova, Konstantin Gribanov, Stefani C. Foka, Vyacheslav Zakharov, Thomas Blumenstock, Michael Buchwitz, Christopher Diekmann, Benjamin Ertl, Matthias M. Frey, Hamud Kh. Imhasin, Dmitry V. Ionov, Farahnaz Khosrawi, Sergey I. Osipov, Maximilian Reuter, Matthias Schneider, Thorsten Warneke. Investigation of spaceborne trace gas products over St Petersburg and Yekaterinburg, Russia, by using COllaborative Column Carbon Observing Network (COCCON) observations // Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2022. V. 15. P. 2199–2229. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2199-2022 2. Barthlott S., Schneider M., Hase F., Wiegele A., Christner E., González Y., Blumenstock T., Dohe S., García O.E., Sepúlveda E., Strong K., Mendonca J., Weaver D., Palm M., Deutscher N.M., Warneke T., Notholt J., Lejeune B., Mahieu E., Jones N., Griffith D.W.T., Velazco V.A., Smale D., Robinson J., Kivi R., Heikkinen P., Raffalski U. Using XCO2 retrievals for assessing the long-term consistency of NDACC/FTIR data sets // Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015. V. 8. P. 1555–1573. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1555-2015 3. Beck V., Koch T., Kretschmer R., Marshall J., Ahmadov R., Gerbig C., Pillai D., Heimann M. The WRF Greenhouse Gas Model (WRF-GHG) // Technical Report No. 25. 2011. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany. 4. Bovensmann H., Buchwitz M., Burrows J.P., Reuter M., Krings T., Gerilowski K., Schneising O., Heymann J., Tretner A., Erzinger J. A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO2 emissions from space and related applications // Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2010. V. 3. P. 781–811. 5. Buchwitz M., de Beek R., Burrows J.P., Bovensmann H., Warneke T., Nothol J., Meirink J.F., Goede A.P.H., Bergamaschi P., Korner S., Heimann M., Schulz A. Atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide from SCIAMACHY satellite data: initial comparison with chemistry and transport models // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2005. V. 5. P. 941–962. www.atmos-chem-phys.org/acp/5/941.
|
|