EXPLORING PATTERNS OF HUMAN MORTALITY AND AGING: A RELIABILITY THEORY VIEWPOINT
Author:
Gavrilov L. A12, Gavrilova N. S12
Affiliation:
1. NORC at the University of Chicago 2. Institute for Demographic Research, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
The most important manifestation of aging is an increased risk of death with advancing age, a mortality pattern characterized by empirical regularities known as mortality laws. We highlight three significant ones: the Gompertz law, compensation effect of mortality (CEM), and late-life mortality deceleration and describe new developments in this area. It is predicted that CEM should result in declining relative variability of mortality at older ages. The quiescent phase hypothesis of negligible actuarial aging at younger adult ages is tested and refuted by analyzing mortality of the most recent birth cohorts. To comprehend the aging mechanisms, it is crucial to explain the observed empirical mortality patterns. As an illustrative example of data-directed modeling and the insights it provides, we briefly describe two different reliability models applied to human mortality patterns. The explanation of aging using a reliability theory approach aligns with evolutionary theories of aging, including idea of chronic phenoptosis. This alignment stems from their focus on elucidating the process of organismal deterioration itself, rather than addressing the reasons why organisms are not designed for perpetual existence. This article is a part of a special issue of the journal that commemorates the legacy of the eminent Russian scientist Vladimir Petrovich Skulachev (1935-2023) and his bold ideas about evolution of biological aging and phenoptosis.
Publisher
The Russian Academy of Sciences
Reference101 articles.
1. Cohen, A. A., Ferrucci, L., Fulop, T., Gravel, D., Hao, N., Kriete, A., Levine, M. E., Lipsitz, L. A., Rikkert, M., Rutenberg, A., Stroustrup, N., and Varadhan, R. (2022) A complex systems approach to aging biology, Nat. Aging, 2, 580-591, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-022-00252-6. 2. Gavrilov, L. A., and Gavrilova, N. S. (1991) The Biology of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach, Harwood Academic Publisher, New York. 3. Kirkwood, T. B. L. (1999) Time of Our Lives: The Science of Human Aging, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, p. 40. 4. Kowald, A., and Kirkwood, T. B. L. (2016) Can aging be programmed? A critical literature review, Aging Cell, 15, 986-998, https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12510. 5. Skulachev, M. V., and Skulachev, V. P. (2017) Programmed aging of mammals: Proof of concept and prospects of biochemical approaches for anti-aging therapy, Biochemistry (Moscow), 82, 1403-1422, https://doi.org/10.1134/s000629791712001x.
|
|