On the effectiveness of digital dispute resolution through arbitration in England and Wales

Author:

Rusakova Ekaterina P.1ORCID,Frolova Evgeniya E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Abstract

The intensive growth of the digital economy has created the prerequisites for the emergence of a new mechanism of communication through the barriers of time and borders, which has affected all areas of society, including the area of dispute resolution. The emergence of completely new objects of civil rights in the metaverse requires the legislator to develop a legal basis for their functioning. The need to create special mechanisms for resolving so-called digital disputes has been overdue for a long time, and their legal nature can be completely different, both related to the active integration of information and communication technology, and not arising in the field of finance, trade, intellectual property. It is quite obvious that the main features of such social relations are that their occurrence does not depend on time and boundaries. Thus, the way to resolve digital disputes should correspond to these specific features. Foreign experience in resolving digital disputes indicates, that there is no reality in which they could be avoided. Even a well-created smart contract on the blockchain does not guarantee the absence of controversial situations. Here the problem arises of choosing an adequate way to resolve such disputes, which would meet the necessary conditions, namely, binding and enforceability, and most importantly, correspond to specific features. The global community in the field of digital dispute resolution has chosen arbitration as the basis as the most common, flexible, independent and fast way to resolve disputes. The inclusion of an arbitration clause in smart contracts and the adoption of various rules for resolving digital disputes has become widespread. However even here there are legal conflicts and gaps in the regulation of digital rights, which requires the development of a single unified approach and its implementation into national legislation. In addition, the internal regulation of the dispute resolution procedure in the blockchain also creates a number of unresolved issues. One of the most developed legal systems in the field of digital dispute resolution is traditionally England and Wales. Over the past few years, a number of by-laws have been adopted that have had a significant impact on the development of this area, as well as the reform of arbitration legislation have created all the prerequisites for creating the most favorable conditions for the parties to a digital dispute to submit the dispute to English arbitration and in accordance with the law of England and Wales.

Publisher

The Russian Academy of Sciences

Reference13 articles.

1. Kleandrov M. I. Justice and fairness. M., 2022 (in Russ.).

2. Rusakova E. P. Kleros Court: is revolution of dispute resolution? // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2022. Vol. 15. No. 5. Pp. 278– 281 (in Russ.).

3. Technological Imperatives of the Modern World and the Role of Law

4. Aragon Network Jurisdiction. Part 1: Decentralized Court. URL: https://blog.aragon.org/aragon-network-jurisdiction-part-1-decentralized-court-c8ab2a675e82/ (accessed: 13.10.2023).

5. Arbitration of cryptoasset and smart contract disputes: arbitration unchained? URL: https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2023/07/arbitration-of-cryptoasset.pdf (accessed: 13.09.2023).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3