Document Type Profiles in Nature, Science, and PNAS: Journal and Country Level
Author:
Ding Jielan12, Ahlgren Per3, Yang Liying1, Yue Ting1
Affiliation:
1. National Science Library , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100190 , China 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100049 , China 3. School of Education and Communication in Engineering Sciences (ECE) , KTH Royal Institute of Technology , Stockholm 100 44 , Sweden
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
In this contribution, we want to detect the document type profiles of the three prestigious journals Nature, Science, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (PNAS) with regard to two levels: journal and country.
Design/methodology/approach
Using relative values based on fractional counting, we investigate the distribution of publications across document types at both the journal and country level, and we use (cosine) document type profile similarity values to compare pairs of publication years within countries.
Findings
Nature and Science mainly publish Editorial Material, Article, News Item and Letter, whereas the publications of PNAS are heavily concentrated on Article. The shares of Article for Nature and Science are decreasing slightly from 1999 to 2014, while the corresponding shares of Editorial Material are increasing. Most studied countries focus on Article and Letter in Nature, but on Letter in Science and PNAS. The document type profiles of some of the studied countries change to a relatively large extent over publication years.
Research limitations
The main limitation of this research concerns the Web of Science classification of publications into document types. Since the analysis of the paper is based on document types of Web of Science, the classification in question is not free from errors, and the accuracy of the analysis might be affected.
Practical implications
Results show that Nature and Science are quite diversified with regard to document types. In bibliometric assessments, where publications in Nature and Science play a role, other document types than Article and Review might therefore be taken into account.
Originality/value
Results highlight the importance of other document types than Article and Review in Nature and Science. Large differences are also found when comparing the country document type profiles of the three journals with the corresponding profiles in all Web of Science journals.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference20 articles.
1. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert A. (1989a). National publication patterns and citation impact in the multidisciplinary journals Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 17(1–2), 11–14. 2. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1989b). Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the Science Citation Index database. Scientometrics, 15(5–6), 325–330. 3. Campanario, J.M., Carretero, J., Marangon, V., Molina, A., & Ros, G. (2011). Effect on the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: a wide-scale study. Scientometrics, 87, 75–84. 4. Frandsen, T.F. (2008). On the ratio of citable versus non-citable items in economics journals. Scientometrics, 74, 439–451. 5. Garfield, E. (1987). Why are the impacts of the leading medical journals so similar and yet so different? Item-by-item audits reveal a diversity of editorial material. Current Contents, 2, 7–13.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|