Comparative analysis of engineering solutions against the shift of the upper part of the ladder when performing work at height-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparative analysis of engineering solutions against the shift of the upper part of the ladder when performing work at height

Published:2021-09-03 Issue:3 Volume: Page:33-39
ISSN:2541-9129
Container-title:SAFETY OF TECHNOGENIC AND NATURAL SYSTEMS
language:
Short-container-title:Bezop. tehnog. prir. sist.

Author:

Senchenko Vladimir A.¹^ORCID,Kaverzneva Tatyana T.²^ORCID,Pushenko Sergey L.³^ORCID,Staseva Elena V.³^ORCID,Rumyantseva Nina V.⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. PAO Rostelecom Volgograd branch

2. Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; St. Petersburg National Research Academic University of Zh.I. Alfyorov of the Russian Academy of Sciences

3. Don State Technical University

4. Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

Abstract

Introduction. Modern construction is characterized by work at a height using stairs. The article presents various engineering solutions aimed at preventing injuries during such work. Problem Statement. The objective of this study is to compare the available engineering solutions aimed at preventing the upper part of the ladder from shifting when performing work at height. Theoretical Part. The work shows the ranking of the existing technical means that allow fixing the upper part of the ladder on the surface of the support and reducing the risk of sliding the upper part of the ladder on the support. It is shown that the structure fixed to the support has the least risk in ensuring the safety of work at height. Conclusion. The article defines the most promising directions of development of technical solutions against shifting the upper part of the ladder.

Publisher

FSFEI HE Don State Technical University

Link

https://bps-journal.ru/upload/iblock/03d/4_Senchenko_33_39.pdf

Reference21 articles.

1. Senchenko V. A., Karaush S. A., Kaverzneva T. T. Safety precautions for works on gable roofs. Construction and Geotechnics. 2017;8(2):5–14. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9826/2017.2.01 (In Russ.).

2. Hsiao H., Simeonova P., Pizatella T. et al. Extension-ladder safety: Solutions and knowledge gaps. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2008;38(11–12.):959–965. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.011

3. Plinera E. M., Seo Na Jin, Beschorner K. E. Factors affecting fall severity from a ladder: Impact of climbing direction, gloves, gender and adaptation. Applied Ergonomics. 2017;60:163–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.011.

4. Socias C. M., Chaumont Menéndez C. K., Collins J. W., Simeonov P. Occupational ladder fall injuries - United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(18):341–346. PMID: 24759655; PMCID: PMC4584774

5. Häkkinen K. K., Pesonen J., Rajamäki E Experiments on safety in the use of portable ladders. Journal of Occupational Accidents. 1988;10(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1016/0376-6349(88)90002-8