Shared Mental Models and Collaborative Activities: a Comparison of Research Approaches

Author:

Pronenko Evgeny A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Don State Technical University

Abstract

Introduction. In domestic science, the activity approach has received great development, in which joint activities were described in sufficient detail, as part of the study of collective activity. On the other hand, the concept of mental representation has been developed in cognitive psychology. However, there are practically no studies in which the concepts of domestic scientists would be compared with the concepts of mental and general mental models that are widely known in foreign psychology.Objective. Analyze and compare research approaches to the formation of common mental models and the formation of joint activities.Concept and characteristics of mental models. Foreign researchers consider mental models as internal (mental) images of the external world, which can be represented by internal images, knowledge, ideas about specific or generalized situations, systems of the surrounding world. For a person to function optimally in the world, it is important that their mental models are sufficiently complex and accurate.Shared mental models. Research interest in shared mental models arose from the need to find ways to improve the performance of work teams. Essentially, it is the shared cognitive representation of team members about tasks, goals, conditions, other members and their behavior. The most important characteristic of shared mental models is similarity, which is important to ensure. Research in this area has shown that a high degree of similarity together with a high degree of accuracy can lead to high production results. A comparison of scientific ideas about common mental models and joint activities showed that: 1) similarity can be correlated with the unity of the group meaning-forming context; 2) the process of integrating individual mental models into a common one is correlated with the process of forming joint mental activity and achieving semantic resonance, 3) communication in creating a common mental model with subject-subject interaction and the second stratum of relationships in the team.Discussion. Comparing research approaches from different paradigms can have a significant positive impact on the development of scientific knowledge. The importance of this is emphasized by the fact that today the development of the concepts of a common mental model and joint activity proceed in almost parallel paths without mutual citation, despite similar scientific subjects.

Publisher

FSFEI HE Don State Technical University

Reference20 articles.

1. Belousova, A. K. (2002). Self-organization of joint mental activity. Publishing house of the Russian State Pedagogical University.

2. Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The nature of explanation. University Press.

3. Craik, K. J. W. (1967). The nature of explanation. CUP Archive.

4. DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). Measuring shared team mental models: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017455

5. Dotsenko, E. L. (1998). Interpersonal communication: semantics and mechanisms. TOGIRRO.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3