Allowing for segregation in ECEC? Legal conditions, administrative structures and enrolment practice in Germany

Author:

Nebe GesineORCID

Abstract

Supposedly children are to learn together in surroundings mirroring the overall democratic and diverse make-up of society. Segregation in ECEC is undesirable. However, substantial segregation exists - even in systems designed for universal, high-quality ECEC provision. While some research has already carved out the role of parents´ choice of institutions, little is known about how children are selected by institutions. This article attempts to shed light on institutional choice as a variable for segregation. Including a detailed picture of the German ECEC system and pointing out administrative relations between municipalities and providers in Germany, this article will depict enrolment. It will draw an empirically based ‘tryptich’, focusing on municipalities´, provider organisation managers` and ECEC centre managers` views on enrolment. Findings will lead to a call for providers and municipalities to join efforts in order to design and implement enrolment procedures that prevent segregation.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

Journal of Childhood, Education and Society

Subject

Education,Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference55 articles.

1. APA. (2019). Gender. APA - American Psychological Association. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/bias-free-language/gender

2. APA. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association: The official guide to APA style (Seventh edition). APA.

3. Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung. (2020). Bildung in Deutschland 2020: Ein indikatorengestützter Bericht mit einer Analyse zu Bildung in einer digitalisierten Welt. wbv Media. https://www.bildungsbericht.de/de/bildungsberichte-seit-2006/bildungsbericht-2020/pdf-dateien-2020/bildungsbericht-2020-barrierefrei.pdf

4. Bieker, R. (2011). Trägerstrukturen in der Sozialen Arbeit – ein Überblick,. In R. Bieker & P. Floerecke (Eds.), Träger, Arbeitsfelder und Zielgruppen der Sozialen Arbeit (1st ed., pp. 13–43). Kohlhammer Verlag.

5. Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3