Abstract
AbstractTo recover the reflectance and shape of an object in a scene, the human visual system must account for the properties of the light illuminating the object. Here, we examine the extent to which multiple objects within a scene are utilised to estimate the direction of lighting in a scene. In Experiment 1, we presented participants with rendered scenes that contained 1, 9, or 25 unfamiliar blob-like objects and measured their capacity to discriminate whether a directional light source was left or right of the participants’ vantage point. Trends reported for ensemble perception suggest that the number of utilised objects—and, consequently, discrimination sensitivity—would increase with set size. However, we find little indication that increasing the number of objects in a scene increased discrimination sensitivity. In Experiment 2, an equivalent noise analysis was used to measure participants’ internal noise and the number of objects used to judge the average light source direction in a scene, finding that participants relied on 1 or 2 objects to make their judgement regardless of whether 9 or 25 objects were present. In Experiment 3, participants completed a shape identification task that required an implicit judgement of light source direction, rather than an explicit judgement as in Experiments 1 and 2. We find that sensitivity for identifying surface shape was comparable for scenes containing 1, 9, and 25 objects. Our results suggest that the visual system relied on a small number of objects to estimate the direction of lighting in our rendered scenes.
Funder
Australian Government
Australian Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sensory Systems,Language and Linguistics,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference64 articles.
1. Allard, R., & Cavanagh, P. (2012). Different processing strategies underlie voluntary averaging in low and high noise. Journal of Vision, 12(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.11.6
2. Attewell, D., & Baddeley, R. J. (2007). The distribution of reflectances within the visual environment. Vision Research, 47(4), 548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.015
3. Barlow, H. B. (1956). Retinal noise and absolute threshold. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 46(8), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.1364/josa.46.000634
4. Betancourt, M. (2020). Towards a principled Bayesian workflow. Retrieved from https://betanalpha.github.io/assets/case_studies/principled_bayesian_workflow.html
5. Boyaci, H., Doerschner, K., & Maloney, L. T. (2004). Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity. Journal of Vision, 4(9), 664–679. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.9.1