Timing of internal processes: Investigating introspection about the costs of task switching and memory search

Author:

Bratzke Daniel,Bryce Donna

Abstract

AbstractDuring the last two decades, there has been new interest in introspection about multitasking performance. In this field, subjective timing of one’s own reaction times (introspective RTs) has proven a useful measure to assess introspection. However, whether timing our own cognitive processing makes use of the same timing mechanisms as timing external intervals has been called into question. Here we take a novel approach to this question and build on the previously observed dissociation between the interference of task switching and memory search with a concurrent time production task whereby temporal productions increased with increasing memory set size but were not affected by switch costs. We tested whether a similar dissociation could be observed in this paradigm when participants provide introspective RTs instead of concurrent temporal productions. The results showed no such dissociation as switch costs and the effect of memory set size on RTs were both reflected in introspective RTs. These findings indicate that the underlying timing mechanisms differ between temporal productions and introspective RTs in this multitasking context, and that introspective RTs are still strikingly accurate estimates of objective RTs.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Sensory Systems,Language and Linguistics,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference29 articles.

1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Sotware, 67, 1–48.

2. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

3. Bratzke, D., & Bryce, D. (2016). Temporal discrimination of one’s own reaction times in dual-task performance: Context effects and methodological constraints. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 1806–1816.

4. Bratzke, D., & Bryce, D. (2019). Introspection is not always blind to the costs of multitasking: The case of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 980–992.

5. Bratzke, D., & Janczyk, M. (2021). Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 85, 605–617.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3