The time course of the spatial representation of ‘past’ and ‘future’ concepts: New evidence from the STEARC effect
-
Published:2024-02-27
Issue:3
Volume:86
Page:1048-1055
-
ISSN:1943-3921
-
Container-title:Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atten Percept Psychophys
Author:
Scozia Gabriele,Pinto Mario,Lozito Silvana,Binetti Nicola,Pazzaglia Mariella,Lasaponara Stefano,Doricchi Fabrizio
Abstract
AbstractHumans use space to think of and communicate the flow of time. This spatial representation of time is influenced by cultural habits so that in left-to-right reading cultures, short durations and past events are mentally positioned to the left of long durations and future events. The STEARC effect (Space Temporal Association of Response Codes) shows a faster classification of short durations/past events with responses on the left side of space and of long durations/future events with responses on the right side. We have recently showed that during the classification of time durations, space is a late heuristic of time because in this case, the STEARC appears only when manual responses are slow, not when they are fast. Here, we wished to extend this observation to the semantic classification of words as referring to the ‘past’ or the ‘future’. We hypothesised that the semantic processing of ‘past’ and ‘future’ concepts would have engaged slower decision processes than the classification of short versus long time durations. According to dual-route models of conflict tasks, if the task-dependent classification/decision process were to proceed relatively slowly, then the effects of direct activation of culturally preferred links between stimulus and response (S-R), i.e., past/left and future/right in the case of the present task, should attain higher amplitudes before the instruction-dependent correct response is selected. This would imply that, at variance with the faster classification of time durations, during the slower semantic classification of time concepts, in incongruent trials, the direct activation of culturally preferred S-R links should introduce significant reaction time (RT) costs and a corresponding STEARC at the fastest manual responses in the experiment too. The study's results confirmed this hypothesis and showed that in the classification of temporal words, the STEARC also increased as a function of the length of RTs. Taken together, the results from sensory duration and semantic classification STEARC tasks show that the occurrence, strength and time course of the STEARC varies significantly as a function of the speed and level of cognitive processing required in the task.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Aiello, M., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Merola, S., Ottaviani, T., Tomaiuolo, F., Bueti, D., … & Doricchi, F. (2012). No inherent left and right side in human ‘mental number line’: Evidence from right brain damage. Brain, 135(8), 2492-2505. 2. Anelli, F., Peters-Founshtein, G., Shreibman, Y., Moreh, E., Forlani, C., Frassinetti, F., & Arzy, S. (2018). Nature and nurture effects on the spatiality of the mental time line. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29584-3 3. Bonato, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2012). When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(10), 2257–2273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.007 4. Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive psychology, 43(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748 5. Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106(2), 579–593.
|
|