How far can I reach? The perception of upper body action capabilities in Parkinson’s disease
-
Published:2021-07-06
Issue:8
Volume:83
Page:3259-3274
-
ISSN:1943-3921
-
Container-title:Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atten Percept Psychophys
Author:
Readman Megan Rose,McLatchie Neil M.,Poliakoff Ellen,Crawford Trevor J.,Linkenauger Sally A.
Abstract
AbstractSuccessful interaction within the environment is contingent upon one’s ability to accurately perceive the extent over which they can successfully perform actions, known as action boundaries. Healthy young adults are accurate in estimating their action boundaries and can flexibly update them to accommodate stable changes in their action capabilities. However, there are conditions in which motor abilities are subject to variability over time such as in Parkinson’s disease (PD). PD impairs the ability to perform actions and can lead to variability in perceptual-motor experience, but the effect on the perceptions of their action boundaries remains unknown. This study investigated the influence of altered perceptual-motor experience during PD, on the perceptions of action boundaries for reaching, grasping, and aperture passing. Thirty participants with mild-to-moderate idiopathic PD and 26 healthy older adults provided estimates of their reaching, grasping, and aperture-passing ability. Participants’ estimates were compared with their actual capabilities. There was no evidence that individuals with PD’s perceptions were less accurate than those of healthy controls. Furthermore, there was some evidence for more conservative estimates than seen in young healthy adults in reaching (both groups) and aperture passing (PD group). This suggests that the ability to judge action capabilities is preserved in mild to moderate PD.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sensory Systems,Language and Linguistics,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference85 articles.
1. Abbruzzese, G., Avanzino, L., Marchese, R., & Pelosin, E. (2015). Action observation and motor imagery: innovative cognitive tools in the rehabilitation of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s Disease, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/124214 2. Adolph, K. E., Cole, W. G., Komati, M., Garciaguirre, J. S., Badaly, D., Lingeman, J. M., Chan, G. L. Y., & Sotsky, R. B. (2012). How do you learn to walk? Thousands of steps and dozens of falls per day. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1387–1394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446346 3. Agid, Y., Javoy-Agid, F., Ruberg, M., Pillon, B., Dubois, B., Duyckaerts, C., Hauw, J. J., Baron, J. C., & Scatton, B. (1987). Progressive supranuclear palsy: Anatomoclinical and biochemical considerations. Advances in Neurology, 45, 191–206. 4. Altgassen, M., Phillips, L., Kopp, U., & Kliegel, M. (2007). Role of working memory components in planning performance of individuals with Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 45(10), 2393–2397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.018 5. Avanzino, L., Pelosin, E., Martino, D., & Abbruzzese, G. (2013). Motor timing deficits in sequential movements in Parkinson disease are related to action planning: A motor imagery study. PLOS ONE, 8(9), Article e75454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075454
|
|