Resolving conflict between aversive and appetitive learning of views: how ants shift to a new route during navigation
-
Published:2023-08-24
Issue:4
Volume:51
Page:446-457
-
ISSN:1543-4494
-
Container-title:Learning & Behavior
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Learn Behav
Author:
Lionetti Vito A. G.,Deeti Sudhakar,Murray Trevor,Cheng Ken
Abstract
AbstractAnts store and recall views associated with foraging success, facilitating future foraging journeys. Negative views are also learned, but instead prompt avoidance behaviors such as turning away. However, little is known about the aversive view’s role in navigation, the effect of cue conflict, or the contextual relationship between learning and recalling. In this study, we tested Myrmecia midas’ capacity for aversive learning of views either independently of or in conflict with appetitive events. We either captured and released foragers when reaching a location or let them pass unhindered. After a few journeys, captured foragers exhibited aversive learning by circumventing the capture location and increasing both meandering and scanning. Ants that experienced foraging-appetitive and homing-aversive events on their journeys exhibited lower rates of avoidance behavior and scans than those experiencing aversive events in both outbound and homebound journeys. The foraging-aversive and homing-aversive ants exhibited similar levels of avoidance and scanning as those that experienced the foraging-aversive and homing-appetitive. We found that foragers showed evidence of context specificity in their scanning behavior, but not in other measures of aversive learning. The foragers did not increase their meandering and scans while approaching the views associated with aversive events. In addition to shedding light on the role of aversive views in navigation, our finding has important implications for understanding the learning mechanisms triggered by handling animals.
Funder
Macquarie University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference43 articles.
1. Ardin, P., Peng, F., Mangan, M., Lagogiannis, K., & Webb, B. (2016). Using an insect mushroom body circuit to encode route memory in complex natural environments. PLoS Computational Biology, 12(2), e1004683. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1004683 2. Aso, Y., Sitaraman, D., Ichinose, T., Kaun, K. R., Vogt, K., Belliart-Guérin, G., Plaçais, P. Y., Robie, A. A., Yamagata, N., Schnaitmann, C., Rowell, W. J., Johnston, R. M., Ngo, T. T. B., Chen, N., Korff, W., Nitabach, M. N., Heberlein, U., Preat, T., Branson, K. M., & Rubin, G. M. (2014). Mushroom body output neurons encode valence and guide memory-based action selection in drosophila. ELife, 3, e04580. https://doi.org/10.7554/ELIFE.04580 3. Benhamou, S. (2004). How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal’s path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 229(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTBI.2004.03.016 4. Bitterman, M. E., Menzel, R., Fietz, A., & Schäfer, S. (1983). Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983), 97(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.97.2.107. 5. Bouton, M. E. (2007). Learning and behavior: A contemporary synthesis.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|