Abstract
AbstractHumans have conscious experiences of the events in their environment. Previous research from electroencephalography (EEG) has shown visual awareness negativity (VAN) at about 200 ms to be a neural correlate of consciousness (NCC). However, when considering VAN as an NCC, it is important to explore which particular experiences are associated with VAN. Recent research proposes that VAN is an NCC of lower-level experiences (detection) rather than higher-level experiences (identification). However, previous results are mixed and have several limitations. In the present study, the stimulus was a ring with a Gabor patch tilting either left or right. On each trial, subjects rated their awareness on a three-level perceptual awareness scale that captured both detection (something vs. nothing) and identification (identification vs. something). Separate staircases were used to adjust stimulus opacity to the detection threshold and the identification threshold. Bayesian linear mixed models provided extreme evidence (BF10 = 131) that VAN was stronger at the detection threshold than at the identification threshold. Mean VAN decreased from $$-$$
-
2.12 microV [$$-$$
-
2.86, $$-$$
-
1.42] at detection to $$-$$
-
0.46 microV [$$-$$
-
0.79, $$-$$
-
0.11] at identification. These results strongly support the claim that VAN is an NCC of lower-level experiences of seeing something rather than of higher-level experiences of specific properties of the stimuli. Thus, results are consistent with recurrent processing theory in that phenomenal visual consciousness is reflected by VAN. Further, results emphasize that it is important to consider the level of experience when searching for NCC.
Funder
Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience
Reference83 articles.
1. Alday, P. M., & van Paridon, J. (2021). Away from arbitrary thresholds: Using robust statistics to improve artifact rejection in ERP (preprint). PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wqrb5
2. Allaire, J. J., Xie, Y., McPherson, J., Luraschi, J., Ushey, K., Atkins, A., ... Iannone, R. (2021). Rmarkdown: Dynamic documents for r. manual. https://github.com/rstudio/rmarkdown
3. Andersen, L. M., Pedersen, M. N., Sandberg, K., & Overgaard, M. (2016). Occipital MEG activity in the early time range ($$<300$$ ms) predicts graded changes in perceptual consciousness. Cerebral Cortex, 26(6), 2677–2688. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv108
4. Andersen, L. M., Vinding, M. C., Sandberg, K., & Overgaard, M. (2022). Task requirements affect the neural correlates of consciousness. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15820,. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15820
5. Aru, J., & Bachmann, T. (2017). In and Out of Consciousness: How Does Conscious Processing (D)evolve Over Time? Frontiers in Psychology, 8,. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00128
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献