Visuo-motor interference is modulated by task interactivity: A kinematic study
-
Published:2023-05-01
Issue:5
Volume:30
Page:1788-1801
-
ISSN:1069-9384
-
Container-title:Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Psychon Bull Rev
Author:
Rocca Matilde, Sacheli Lucia Maria, Romeo Luca, Cavallo AndreaORCID
Abstract
AbstractExtensive evidence shows that action observation can influence action execution, a phenomenon often referred to as visuo-motor interference. Little is known about whether this effect can be modulated by the type of interaction agents are involved in, as different studies show conflicting results. In the present study, we aimed at shedding light on this question by recording and analyzing the kinematic unfolding of reach-to-grasp movements performed in interactive and noninteractive settings. Using a machine learning approach, we investigated whether the extent of visuo-motor interference would be enhanced or reduced in two different joint action settings compared with a noninteractive one. Our results reveal that the detrimental effect of visuo-motor interference is reduced when the action performed by the partner is relevant to achieve a common goal, regardless of whether this goal requires to produce a concrete sensory outcome in the environment (joint outcome condition) or only a joint movement configuration (joint movement condition). These findings support the idea that during joint actions we form dyadic motor plans, in which both our own and our partner’s actions are represented in predictive terms and in light of the common goal to be achieved. The formation of a dyadic motor plan might allow agents to shift from the automatic simulation of an observed action to the active prediction of the consequences of a partner’s action. Overall, our results demonstrate the unavoidable impact of others’ action on our motor behavior in social contexts, and how strongly this effect can be modulated by task interactivity.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Torino
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference51 articles.
1. Ansuini, C., Cavallo, A., Koul, A., Jacono, M., Yang, Y., & Becchio, C. (2015). Predicting object size from hand kinematics: A temporal perspective. PLOS ONE, 10(3), Article e0120432. 2. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. 3. Blakemore, S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2005). The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia, 43(2), 260–267. 4. Boukarras, S., Özkan, D. G., Era, V., Moreau, Q., Tieri, G., & Candidi, M. (2022). Midfrontal theta transcranial alternating current stimulation facilitates motor coordination in dyadic human–avatar interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34(5), 897–915. 5. Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 124–143.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|