Cognitive modelling of concepts in the mental lexicon with multilayer networks: Insights, advancements, and future challenges
-
Published:2024-03-04
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1069-9384
-
Container-title:Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Psychon Bull Rev
Author:
Stella MassimoORCID, Citraro SalvatoreORCID, Rossetti GiulioORCID, Marinazzo DanieleORCID, Kenett Yoed N.ORCID, Vitevitch Michael S.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe mental lexicon is a complex cognitive system representing information about the words/concepts that one knows. Over decades psychological experiments have shown that conceptual associations across multiple, interactive cognitive levels can greatly influence word acquisition, storage, and processing. How can semantic, phonological, syntactic, and other types of conceptual associations be mapped within a coherent mathematical framework to study how the mental lexicon works? Here we review cognitive multilayer networks as a promising quantitative and interpretative framework for investigating the mental lexicon. Cognitive multilayer networks can map multiple types of information at once, thus capturing how different layers of associations might co-exist within the mental lexicon and influence cognitive processing. This review starts with a gentle introduction to the structure and formalism of multilayer networks. We then discuss quantitative mechanisms of psychological phenomena that could not be observed in single-layer networks and were only unveiled by combining multiple layers of the lexicon: (i) multiplex viability highlights language kernels and facilitative effects of knowledge processing in healthy and clinical populations; (ii) multilayer community detection enables contextual meaning reconstruction depending on psycholinguistic features; (iii) layer analysis can mediate latent interactions of mediation, suppression, and facilitation for lexical access. By outlining novel quantitative perspectives where multilayer networks can shed light on cognitive knowledge representations, including in next-generation brain/mind models, we discuss key limitations and promising directions for cutting-edge future research.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Trento
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference149 articles.
1. Abbott, J. T., Austerweil, J. L., & Griffiths, T. L. (2015). Random walks on semantic networks can resemble optimal foraging. Psychological Review, 122(3), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038693 2. Aerts, H., Fias, W., Caeyenberghs, K., & Marinazzo, D. (2016). Brain networks under attack: Robustness properties and the impact of lesions. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww194 3. Aitchison, J. (2012). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Wiley-Blackwell. 4. Aleta, A., & Moreno, Y. (2019). Multilayer networks in a nutshell. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 10, 45–62. 5. Amico, E., Abbas, K., Duong-Tran, D. A., Tipnis, U., Rajapandian, M., Chumin, E., Ventresca, M., Harezlak, J., & Goñi, J. (2021). Toward an information theoretical description of communication in brain networks. Network Neuroscience, 5(3), 646–665.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|