Author:
Savino Michelina,Winter Bodo,Bosco Andrea,Grice Martine
Abstract
AbstractA sequence of spoken digits is easier to recall if the digits are grouped into smaller chunks (e.g., through the insertion of pauses). It has been claimed that intonation does not facilitate recall over and above the effect achieved by pauses. This may be related to the fact that past research has used synthesized intonation contours. In this replication study, we show that intonation does provide benefits once more naturalistic intonation contours are used. This benefit is independent of response modality (spoken responses, keyboard responses, or handwritten responses in a grid). We furthermore show that intonation differentially affects specific positions within the sequence of digits. Crucially, our results suggest that researchers and clinicians need to pay attention to intonation when assessing working memory using spoken language.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference29 articles.
1. Baddeley, A., Eysenck M.W., & Anderson, M. C. (2009). Memory. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
2. Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 131-151.
3. Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). brms: An R Package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
5. Bürkner, P. C., & Charpentier, E. (2018). Monotonic effects: A principled approach for including ordinal predictors in regression models. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9qkhj
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献