Conversation in small groups: Speaking and listening strategies depend on the complexities of the environment and group
-
Published:2020-10-13
Issue:2
Volume:28
Page:632-640
-
ISSN:1069-9384
-
Container-title:Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Psychon Bull Rev
Author:
Hadley Lauren V.,Whitmer William M.,Brimijoin W. Owen,Naylor Graham
Abstract
AbstractMany conversations in our day-to-day lives are held in noisy environments – impeding comprehension, and in groups – taxing auditory attention-switching processes. These situations are particularly challenging for older adults in cognitive and sensory decline. In noisy environments, a variety of extra-linguistic strategies are available to speakers and listeners to facilitate communication, but while models of language account for the impact of context on word choice, there has been little consideration of the impact of context on extra-linguistic behaviour. To address this issue, we investigate how the complexity of the acoustic environment and interaction situation impacts extra-linguistic conversation behaviour of older adults during face-to-face conversations. Specifically, we test whether the use of intelligibility-optimising strategies increases with complexity of the background noise (from quiet to loud, and in speech-shaped vs. babble noise), and with complexity of the conversing group (dyad vs. triad). While some communication strategies are enhanced in more complex background noise, with listeners orienting to talkers more optimally and moving closer to their partner in babble than speech-shaped noise, this is not the case with all strategies, as we find greater vocal level increases in the less complex speech-shaped noise condition. Other behaviours are enhanced in the more complex interaction situation, with listeners using more optimal head orientations, and taking longer turns when gaining the floor in triads compared to dyads. This study elucidates how different features of the conversation context impact individuals’ communication strategies, which is necessary to both develop a comprehensive cognitive model of multimodal conversation behaviour, and effectively support individuals that struggle conversing.
Funder
Medical Research Council Chief Scientist Office
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference46 articles.
1. Anderson, A. H., Bard, E. G., Sotillo, C., Newlands, A., & Doherty-Sneddon, G. (1997). Limited visual control of the intelligibility of speech in face-to-face dialogue. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(4), 580–592. 2. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 941–952. 3. Beechey, T., Buchholz, J. M., & Keidser, G. (2018). Measuring communication difficulty through effortful speech production during conversation. Speech Communication, 100, 18–29. 4. Bowling, A., Gabriel, Z., Dykes, J., Dowding, L. M., Evans, O., Fleissig, A., … Sutton, S. (2003). Let’s ask them: a national survey of definitions of quality of life and its enhancement among people aged 65 and over. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 56(4), 269–306. 5. Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Tran, K., Arlinger, S., Wilbraham, K., Cox, R., … Ludvigsen, C. (1994). An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(4), 2108–2120.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|