1. Acevedo, M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Evidential reasoning in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 431–457. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30039074
2. al-Nowaihi, A., & Dhami, S. (2015). Evidential equilibria: Heuristics and biases in static games of complete information. Games, 6(4), 637–676. https://doi.org/10.3390/g6040637
3. Anderlini, L. (1999). Communication, computability, and common interest games. Games and Economic Behavior, 27, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1998.0652
4. Aumann, R. J. (1987). Correlated equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian rationality. Econometrica, 55, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911154
5. Aumann, R. J. (1990). Nash equilibria are not self-enforcing. In J. J. Gabszewicz, J. F. Richard, & L. A. Wolsey (Eds.), Economic decision making: Games econometrics and optimization: Contributions in honour of Jacques H. Drèze (pp. 201–206). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.