Abstract
AbstractOptic flow provides information on movement direction and speed during locomotion. Changing the relationship between optic flow and walking speed via training has been shown to influence subsequent distance and hill steepness estimations. Previous research has shown that experience with slow optic flow at a given walking speed was associated with increased effort and distance overestimation in comparison to experiencing with fast optic flow at the same walking speed. Here, we investigated whether exposure to different optic flow speeds relative to gait influences perceptions of leaping and jumping ability. Participants estimated their maximum leaping and jumping ability after exposure to either fast or moderate optic flow at the same walking speed. Those calibrated to fast optic flow estimated farther leaping and jumping abilities than those calibrated to moderate optic flow. Findings suggest that recalibration between optic flow and walking speed may specify an action boundary when calibrated or scaled to actions such as leaping, and possibly, the manipulation of optic flow speed has resulted in a change in the associated anticipated effort for walking a prescribed distance, which in turn influence one’s perceived action capabilities for jumping and leaping.
Funder
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Adams, H., Narasimham, G., Rieser, J., Creem-Regehr, S., Stefanucci, J., & Bodenheimer, B. (2018). Locomotive recalibration and prism adaptation of children and teens in immersive virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(4), 1408–1417.
2. Brand, M. T., & de Oliveira, R. F. (2017). Recalibration in functional perceptual-motor tasks: A systematic review. Human Movement Science, 56, 54–70.
3. Bruggeman, H., & Warren, W. H. (2010). The direction of walking—but not throwing or kicking—is adapted by optic flow. Psychological Science, 21(7), 1006–1013.
4. Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. In K. S. Jones (Ed.), How shall affordances be refined? Four perspectives (pp. 181–195). Routledge.
5. Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. J. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 69–117). Academic Press.