1. Allan, L. G. (1980). A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,15, 147–149.
2. Baker, A. G., Berbrier, M., &Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (1989). Judgments of a 2 × 2 contingency table: Sequential processing and the learning curve.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41B, 65–97.
3. Baker, A. G., Mercier, P., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Frank, R., &Pan, M. (1993). Selective association and causality judgments: Presence of a strong causal factor may reduce judgments of a weaker one.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 414–432.
4. Baker, A. G., Murphy, R. A., &Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (1996). Associative and normative models of causal induction: Reacting to versus understanding cause. In D. R. Shanks, K. Holyoak, & D. Medin (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 34, pp. 1–45). San Diego: Academic Press.
5. Chapman, G. B., &Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.Memory & Cognition,18, 537–545.