1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and non-conscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Arbuthnott, K. D. (2005). The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1030–1042.
3. Arbuthnott, K. D. (in press). Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology.
4. Arbuthnott, K. [D.], & Frank, J. [E.] (2000). Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 33–41.
5. Arbuthnott, K. D., & Woodward, T. S. (2002). The influence of cue— task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 18–29.