1. Callebaut, W. (1993).Taking the naturalistic turn or how real philosophy of science is done. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E., &Yardleyd, L. (Eds.) (2003).Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Capaldi, E. J., &Proctor, R. W. (2000). Laudan’s normative naturalism: A useful philosophy of science for psychology.American Journal of Psychology,133, 430–454.
4. Capaldi, E. J., &Proctor, R. W. (2005). Is the worldview of qualitative inquiry a proper guide for psychological research methods?American Journal of Psychology,118, 252–269.
5. Dunbar, K., &Fugelsang, J. A. (2005). Causal thinking in science: How scientists and students interpret the unexpected. In M. E. Gorman, R. D. Tweney, D. C. Gooding, & A. P. Kincannon (Eds.),Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 57–79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.