The Grievance Dictionary: Understanding threatening language use
-
Published:2021-03-23
Issue:5
Volume:53
Page:2105-2119
-
ISSN:1554-3528
-
Container-title:Behavior Research Methods
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Behav Res
Author:
van der Vegt Isabelle,Mozes Maximilian,Kleinberg Bennett,Gill Paul
Abstract
AbstractThis paper introduces the Grievance Dictionary, a psycholinguistic dictionary that can be used to automatically understand language use in the context of grievance-fueled violence threat assessment. We describe the development of the dictionary, which was informed by suggestions from experienced threat assessment practitioners. These suggestions and subsequent human and computational word list generation resulted in a dictionary of 20,502 words annotated by 2318 participants. The dictionary was validated by applying it to texts written by violent and non-violent individuals, showing strong evidence for a difference between populations in several dictionary categories. Further classification tasks showed promising performance, but future improvements are still needed. Finally, we provide instructions and suggestions for the use of the Grievance Dictionary by security professionals and (violence) researchers.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference57 articles.
1. Abbasi, A., & Chen, H. (2007). Affect intensity analysis of dark web forums. 2007 IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics, 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2007.379486 2. Akrami, N., Shrestha, A., Berggren, M., Kaati, L., Obaidi, M., & Cohen, K. (2018). Assessment of risk in written communication: Introducing the Profile Risk Assessment Tool (PRAT). EUROPOL. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-367346. Accessed 4 Dec 2019 3. Baele, S. J. (2017). Lone-actor terrorists’ emotions and cognition: An evaluation beyond stereotypes. Political Psychology, 38(3), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12365 4. Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Müller, S., Perry, P. O., Lauderdale, B., & Lowe, W. (2020). quanteda.textmodels: Scaling Models and Classifiers for Textual Data [R]. 5. Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S., & Matsuo, A. (2018). quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|