Abstract
AbstractBecause of the increasing popularity of voice-controlled virtual assistants, such as Amazon’s Alexa and Google Assistant, they should be considered a new medium for psychological and behavioral research. We developed Survey Mate, an extension of Google Assistant, and conducted two studies to analyze the reliability and validity of data collected through this medium. In the first study, we assessed validated procrastination and shyness scales as well as social desirability indicators for both the virtual assistant and an online questionnaire. The results revealed comparable internal consistency and construct and criterion validity. In the second study, five social psychological experiments, which have been successfully replicated by the Many Labs projects, were successfully reproduced using a virtual assistant for data collection. Comparable effects were observed for users of both smartphones and smart speakers. Our findings point to the applicability of virtual assistants in data collection independent of the device used. While we identify some limitations, including data privacy concerns and a tendency toward more socially desirable responses, we found that virtual assistants could allow the recruitment of participants who are hard to reach with established data collection techniques, such as people with visual impairment, dyslexia, or lower education. This new medium could also be suitable for recruiting samples from non-Western countries because of its wide availability and easily adaptable language settings. It could also support an increase in the generalizability of theories in the future.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference40 articles.
1. Ammari, T., Kaye, J., Tsai, J. Y., & Bentley, F. (2019). Music, Search, and IoT. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311956
2. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
3. Cheek, J. M. (1983). The Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale (RCBS). Unpublished Manuscript. http://academics.wellesley.edu/Psychology/Cheek/research.html
4. Cicchetti, D. V., Shoinralter, D., & Tyrer, P. J. (1985). The Effect of Number of Rating Scale Categories on Levels of Interrater Reliability : A Monte Carlo Investigation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900103
5. Davie, N., & Hilber, T. (2018). Opportunities and challenges of using Amazon Echo in education. Proceedings of 2018 IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning, 205–208.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献